In pursuit of a nonbusiness model

Any nonbusiness model. A single example of a noncommercial (but also nongovernmental) operating model in the context of any plausibly economic activity in any social setting. Perhaps there is not and never will be and even maybe never can be such an example; demonstrating yet again why nature abhors an anagora. Tom Slee, in Open Wide — The New Inquiry, gives us multiple examples of commons-based online communities that lost their innocence in one way or another, and in the process lost

Image courtesy Sir josef (Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported)

Image courtesy Sir josef (Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported)

whatever authenticity, outsider appeal, alternativity, and the like that originally made these cool spaces in which to be a participant. Not wanting to pirate the article, I will give a list of the entities used as case studies:

  1. Bebo.com, now part of AOL
  2. Goodreads, now part of Amazon
  3. Mendeley, now part of Elsevier
  4. Tumblr, now part of Yahoo!
  5. Zipcar, now part of Avis
  6. IMDB, now part of Amazon
  7. Couchsurfing.com, formerly couchsurfing.org
  8. The Linux Kernel, formerly GNU Linux

In about three quarters of these examples, the fact that the enrichment of the commons had become the sharecropping of the long tail became evident in the form of mergers and acquisitions. I have long wondered whether there’s something in the Iron Laws of Economics that dictates that the role of small businesses and startups is to serve as feeder fish in the world of commerce. I have also questioned whether the trend from employment employment to self employment is at all liberating, empowering, or even conducive to independence in some sense. In terms of my own options for combating nichelessness, I’ve thought of the trend from J.O.B. security to precarity as something I’m being backed into by a combination of a less labor-intensive economy, a less labor-driven polity, a disentitled generation of young adults, and other factors making “cushy” jobs harder to come by. So far, I’ve given the prevailing trend the benefit of the doubt and assumed that there are some people for whom a less risk-averse and less competition-averse culture is a better fit and a more opportune ecosystem, and that these people are in some way changing the world, but I’m beginning to question that. Startup founders describe themselves and their ventures as “disruptive,” but it’s getting hard to identify possible outcomes for such ventures other than (1) a failed business or (2) a business that is for sale. At best, it seems that cooptation is a stronger force than disruption. Is this too an Iron Law of Economics?

About n8chz

पृथ्वी की उच्च किराया जिले में उद्यमिता कौशल अभाव
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to In pursuit of a nonbusiness model

  1. Poor Richard says:

    This is a good set of questions. I think the process of mergers and acquisitions, little fish feeding bigger fish, is pretty much an Iron Law as long as the context is the “open ocean”. What you need for small business to persist is something like a coral reef. One of my attempts to simulate this is the “Green Mall”. I have a little better description somewhere but all I can turn up at the moment is this http://almanac2010.wordpress.com/2011/09/07/the-green-union/

    Another thing, which could be part of the same reef as the green mall, is the idea of a democratic worker-owned temp agency. This might help straddle the gap between employment-employment and self-employment. BTW solitary self employment is IMO the smallest part of the self-employment spectrum. All kinds of partnerships, cooperatives, and other kinds of associations are part of the spectrum of worker-owned democratic enterprises.

    Even outside the coral reef you can have other kinds of niches and enclosures to buffer small fry from predators. Guilds, small business and cooperative associations and federations, etc. One metaphor I use is “circling the wagons”, which can be taken in a number of ways. The central idea is to create a large enough circle to support internal economic recirculation.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s